| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Source files in libcamera start by a comment block header, which
includes the file name and a one-line description of the file contents.
While the latter is useful to get a quick overview of the file contents
at a glance, the former is mostly a source of inconvenience. The name in
the comments can easily get out of sync with the file name when files
are renamed, and copy & paste during development have often lead to
incorrect names being used to start with.
Readers of the source code are expected to know which file they're
looking it. Drop the file name from the header comment block.
The change was generated with the following script:
----------------------------------------
dirs="include/libcamera src test utils"
declare -rA patterns=(
['c']=' \* '
['cpp']=' \* '
['h']=' \* '
['py']='# '
['sh']='# '
)
for ext in ${!patterns[@]} ; do
files=$(for dir in $dirs ; do find $dir -name "*.${ext}" ; done)
pattern=${patterns[${ext}]}
for file in $files ; do
name=$(basename ${file})
sed -i "s/^\(${pattern}\)${name} - /\1/" "$file"
done
done
----------------------------------------
This misses several files that are out of sync with the comment block
header. Those will be addressed separately and manually.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Objects are not expected to be connected to the same signal more than
once. Doing so likely indicates a bug in the code, and can be
highlighted in debug builds with an assert that performs a lookup on the
signals_ list.
While it is possible to allow the implementation to let objects connect
to a specific signal multiple times, there are no expected use cases for
this in libcamera and this behaviour is restricted to favour defensive
programming by raising an error when this occurs.
Remove the support in the test framework which uses multiple Signal
connections on the same object, and update the test to use a second
Signal.
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
It can be useful to connect a signal to a functor, and in particular a
lambda function, while still operating in the context of a receiver
object (to support both object-based disconnection and queued
connections to Object instances).
Add a BoundMethodFunctor class to bind a functor, and a corresponding
Signal::connect() function. There is no corresponding disconnect()
function, as a lambda passed to connect() can't be later passed to
disconnect(). Disconnection typically uses disconnect(T *object), which
will cover the vast majority of use cases.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Usage of 'method' to refer to member functions comes from Java. The C++
standard uses the term 'function' only. Replace 'method' with 'function'
or 'member function' through the whole code base and documentation.
While at it, fix two typos (s/backeng/backend/).
The BoundMethod and Object::invokeMethod() are left as-is here, and will
be addressed separately.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Move the functionality for the following components to the new
base support library:
- BoundMethod
- EventDispatcher
- EventDispatcherPoll
- Log
- Message
- Object
- Signal
- Semaphore
- Thread
- Timer
While it would be preferable to see these split to move one component
per commit, these components are all interdependent upon each other,
which leaves us with one big change performing the move for all of them.
Reviewed-by: Hirokazu Honda <hiroh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Add two tests that exercise the Signal::disconnect(Object *) and
Signal::disconnect() methods, to verify that they correctly remove the
signal from the connected object's list of signals. This triggers an
issue that was detected through manual code inspection, and is expected
to crash or at least generate valgrind warnings.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
Test that a signal can be connected to non-void static and member slots.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
Add tests that exercises the Object-related signal code paths (in
particular automatic disconnection on Signal deletion) when the receiver
inherits from multiple base classes, with Object being the second base.
This tests the casts to and from Object * in the signal implementation.
The new tests segfault due bugs in the signal/slot implementation.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
Member slots for objects deriving from the Object class receive special
handling. Add one test to make sure we exercise the related code paths.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
When a signal is connected to a member function slot, the slot is not
disconnected when the slot object is deleted. This can lead to calling a
member function of a deleted object if the signal isn't disconnected
manually by the slot object's destructor.
Make signal handling easier by implementing a base Object class that
tracks all connected signals and disconnects from them automatically
when the object is deleted, using template specialization resolution in
the Signal class.
As inheriting from the Object class may to a too harsh requirement for
Signal usage in applications, keep the existing behaviour working if the
slot doesn't inherit from the Object class. We may reconsider this later
and require all slot objects to inherit from the Object class.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
The test covers signal connection, disconnection through all the
provided methods, emission, parameters, and connection of a signal to
multiple slots.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
