libcamera: controls: Make ControlValue get/set accessors template methods

The ControlValue get accessors are implemented with functions of
different names, whlie the set accessors use polymorphism to support
different control types. This isn't very consistent and intuitive. Make
the API clearer by using template methods. This will also have the added
advantage that support for the new types will only require adding
template specialisations, without adding new methods.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/test/controls/control_value.cpp b/test/controls/control_value.cpp
index 778efe5c..397c43f7 100644
--- a/test/controls/control_value.cpp
+++ b/test/controls/control_value.cpp
@@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ protected:
 		     << " Bool: " << boolean.toString()
 		     << endl;
 
-		if (integer.getInt() != 1234) {
+		if (integer.get<int>() != 1234) {
 			cerr << "Failed to get Integer" << endl;
 			return TestFail;
 		}
 
-		if (boolean.getBool() != true) {
+		if (boolean.get<bool>() != true) {
 			cerr << "Failed to get Boolean" << endl;
 			return TestFail;
 		}
@@ -45,19 +45,19 @@ protected:
 			return TestFail;
 		}
 
-		value.set(true);
+		value.set<bool>(true);
 		if (value.isNone()) {
 			cerr << "Failed to set an empty object" << endl;
 			return TestFail;
 		}
 
-		if (value.getBool() != true) {
+		if (value.get<bool>() != true) {
 			cerr << "Failed to get Booleans" << endl;
 			return TestFail;
 		}
 
-		value.set(10);
-		if (value.getInt() != 10) {
+		value.set<int>(10);
+		if (value.get<int>() != 10) {
 			cerr << "Failed to get Integer" << endl;
 			return TestFail;
 		}