From 8fceb6ab1d51acfe2af39eb4f0209a767faca86d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jacopo Mondi Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 09:52:47 +0100 Subject: libcamera: Rationalize IPA and handlers names The names used by the IPA interface and the names used for buffer completions handlers in libcamera clash in the use of the term "buffer". For example video device buffer completion handler is called "bufferReady" and the IPA event to ask the IPA to compute parameters are called "fillParamsBuffers". This makes it hard to recognize which function handles video device completion signals and which ones handle the IPA interface events. Rationalize the naming scheme in the IPA interface function and events and the signal handlers in the pipelines, according to the following table. Remove the name "buffer" from the IPA interface events and events handler and reserve it for the buffer completion handlers. Rename the IPA interface events and function to use the 'params' and 'stats' names as well. IPA Interface: - fillParamsBuffer -> computeParams [FUNCTION] - processStatsBuffer -> processStats [FUNCTION] - paramFilled -> paramsComputed [EVENT] Pipeline handler: - bufferReady -> videoBufferReady [BUFFER HANDLER] - paramReady -> paramBufferReady [BUFFER HANDLER] - statReady -> statBufferReady [BUFFER HANDLER] - paramFilled -> paramsComputed [IPA EVENT HANDLER] Cosmetic change only, no functional changes intended. Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi Reviewed-by: Milan Zamazal Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham --- src/ipa/ipu3/ipu3-ipa-design-guide.rst | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/ipa/ipu3/ipu3-ipa-design-guide.rst') diff --git a/src/ipa/ipu3/ipu3-ipa-design-guide.rst b/src/ipa/ipu3/ipu3-ipa-design-guide.rst index 72506397..85d735c6 100644 --- a/src/ipa/ipu3/ipu3-ipa-design-guide.rst +++ b/src/ipa/ipu3/ipu3-ipa-design-guide.rst @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ from applications, and managing events from the pipeline handler. └─┬───┬───┬──────┬────┬────┬────┬─┴────▼─┬──┘ 1: init() │ │ │ │ ▲ │ ▲ │ ▲ │ ▲ │ 2: configure() │1 │2 │3 │4│ │4│ │4│ │4│ │5 3: mapBuffers(), start() - │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 4: (▼) queueRequest(), fillParamsBuffer(), processStatsBuffer() - ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ │ ▼ │ ▼ │ ▼ │ ▼ (▲) setSensorControls, paramsBufferReady, metadataReady Signals + │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 4: (▼) queueRequest(), computeParams(), processStats() + ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ │ ▼ │ ▼ │ ▼ │ ▼ (▲) setSensorControls, paramsComputed, metadataReady Signals ┌──────────────────┴────┴────┴────┴─────────┐ 5: stop(), unmapBuffers() │ IPU3 IPA │ │ ┌───────────────────────┐ │ @@ -104,8 +104,8 @@ to operate when running: - configure() - queueRequest() -- fillParamsBuffer() -- processStatsBuffer() +- computeParams() +- processStats() The configuration phase allows the pipeline-handler to inform the IPA of the current stream configurations, which is then passed into each @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ When configured, the IPA is notified by the pipeline handler of the Camera ``start()`` event, after which incoming requests will be queued for processing, requiring a parameter buffer (``ipu3_uapi_params``) to be populated for the ImgU. This is given to the IPA through -``fillParamsBuffer()``, and then passed directly to each algorithm +``computeParams()``, and then passed directly to each algorithm through the ``prepare()`` call allowing the ISP configuration to be updated for the needs of each component that the algorithm is responsible for. @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ structure that it modifies, and it should take care to ensure that any structure set by a use flag is fully initialised to suitable values. The parameter buffer is returned to the pipeline handler through the -``paramsBufferReady`` signal, and from there queued to the ImgU along +``paramsComputed`` signal, and from there queued to the ImgU along with a raw frame captured with the CIO2. Post-frame completion @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ Post-frame completion When the capture of an image is completed, and successfully processed through the ImgU, the generated statistics buffer (``ipu3_uapi_stats_3a``) is given to the IPA through -``processStatsBuffer()``. This provides the IPA with an opportunity to +``processStats()``. This provides the IPA with an opportunity to examine the results of the ISP and run the calculations required by each algorithm on the new data. The algorithms may require context from the operations of other algorithms, for example, the AWB might choose to use -- cgit v1.2.1