| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The ControlList class has template get() and set() methods to get and
set control values. The methods require a reference to a Control
instance, which is only available when calling them with a hardcoded
control. In order to support usage of ControlList for V4L2 controls, as
well as serialisation and deserialisation of ControlList, we need a way
to get and set control values based on a control numerical ID. Add new
contains(), get() and set() overload methods to do so.
As this change prepares the ControlList to be used for other objects
than camera, update its documentation accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Tested-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
Replace the manual validation of controls against a Camera with usage of
the new ControlValidator interface.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
The ControlList::update() method is unused. While it is meant to fulfil
a need of applications, having no user means that it is most probably
not correctly designed. Remove the method, we will add it back later if
needed.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
Rework the control-related classes to improve the API towards
applications. The goal is to enable writing code similar to
Request *req = ...;
ControlList &controls = req->controls();
controls->set(controls::AwbEnable, false);
controls->set(controls::ManualExposure, 1000);
...
int32_t exposure = controls->get(controls::ManualExposure);
with the get and set operations ensuring type safety for the control
values. This is achieved by creating the following classes:
- Control defines controls and is the main way to reference a control.
It is a template class to allow methods using it to refer to the
control type.
- ControlId is the base class of Control. It stores the control ID, name
and type, and can be used in contexts where a control needs to be
referenced regardless of its type (for instance in lists of controls).
This class replaces ControlIdentifier.
- ControlValue is kept as-is.
The ControlList class now exposes two template get() and set() methods
that replace the operator[]. They ensure type safety by infering the
value type from the Control reference that they receive.
The main way to refer to a control is now through the Control class, and
optionally through its base ControlId class. The ControlId enumeration
is removed, replaced by a list of global Control instances. Numerical
control IDs are turned into macros, and are still exposed as they are
required to communicate with IPAs (especially to deserialise control
lists). They should however not be used by applications.
Auto-generation of header and source files is removed for now to keep
the change simple. It will be added back in the future in a more
elaborate form.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
Make the control API more explicit when dealing with integer controls by
specifying the size. We already do so for 64-bit integers, using int64_t
and ControlTypeInteger64, do the same for 32-bit integers.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
The ControlValue get accessors are implemented with functions of
different names, whlie the set accessors use polymorphism to support
different control types. This isn't very consistent and intuitive. Make
the API clearer by using template methods. This will also have the added
advantage that support for the new types will only require adding
template specialisations, without adding new methods.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
The CameraManager class is not supposed to be instantiated multiple
times, which led to a singleton implementation. This requires a global
instance of the CameraManager, which is destroyed when the global
destructors are executed.
Relying on global instances causes issues with cleanup, as the order in
which the global destructors are run can't be controlled. In particular,
the Android camera HAL implementation ends up destroying the
CameraHalManager after the CameraManager, which leads to use-after-free
problems.
To solve this, remove the CameraManager::instance() method and make the
CameraManager class instantiable directly. Multiple instances are still
not allowed, and this is enforced by storing the instance pointer
internally to be checked when an instance is created.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
|
|
Add tests of the ControlList infrastructure and public API.
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
