summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/ipa/simple/ipa_context.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-09-27libcamera: software_isp: Move color handling to an algorithm moduleMilan Zamazal
After black level handling has been moved to an algorithm module, white balance and the construction of color tables can be moved to algorithm modules too. This time, the moved code is split between stats processing and parameter construction methods. It is also split to two algorithm modules: - White balance computation. - Gamma table computation and color lookup tables construction. While this applies the color gains computed by the white balance algorithm, it is not directly related to white balance. And we may want to modify the color lookup tables in future according to other parameters than just gamma and white balance gains. Gamma table computation and color lookup tables construction could be split to separate algorithms too. But there is no big need for that now so they are kept together for simplicity. This is the only part of the software ISP algorithms that sets the parameters so emitting setIspParams can be moved to prepare() method. A more natural representation of the gains (and black level) would be floating point numbers. This is not done here in order to minimize changes in code movements. It will be addressed in a followup patch. Signed-off-by: Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com> Acked-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
2024-09-27libcamera: software_isp: Move black level to an algorithm moduleMilan Zamazal
The black level determination, already present as a separate class, can be moved to the prepared Algorithm processing structure. It is the first of the current software ISP algorithms that is called in the stats processing sequence, which means it is also the first one that should be moved to the new structure. Stats processing starts with calling Algorithm-based processing so the call order of the algorithms is retained. Movement of this algorithm is relatively straightforward because all it does is processing stats. The comment about getting black level from the tuning files is dropped. The black level will be taken from CameraSensorHelper if available and that will be implemented in one of the followup patches. Black level is now recomputed on each stats processing. In a future patch, after DelayedControls are used, this will be changed to recompute the black level only after exposure/gain changes. The black level depends on the sensor used, the computed value can be reused in a followup capture sessions with the same sensor. Thus it is sufficient to (re)set the initial value in BlackLevel::init. Signed-off-by: Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
2024-09-27libcamera: software_isp: Define skeletons for IPA refactoringMilan Zamazal
Software ISP image processing algorithms are currently defined in a simplified way, different from other libcamera pipelines. This is not good for several reasons: - It makes the software ISP code harder to understand due to its different structuring. - Adding more algorithms may make the code harder to understand generally. - Mass libcamera code changes may not be easily applicable to software ISP. - Algorithm sharing with other pipelines is not easily possible. This patch introduces basic software ISP IPA skeletons structured similarly to the other pipelines. The newly added files are currently not used or compiled and the general skeleton structures don't contain anything particular. It is just a preparation step for a larger refactoring and the code will be actually used and extended as needed in followup patches. Signed-off-by: Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>