| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Pass the current frame number, and the current FrameContext for calls to
prepare.
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
|
|
Frame contexts will become the core component of IPA modules, always
available to functions of the algorithms. To indicate and prepare for
this, turn the frame context pointer passed to Algorithm::process() into
a reference.
The RkISP1 IPA module doesn't use frame contexts yet, so pass a dummy
context for now.
While at it, drop an unneeded [[maybe_unused]] from Agc::process() and
add a missing parameter documentation for the frameContext argument to
Awb::process().
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
|
|
Add queueRequest() function to the Algorithm class. The queueRequest() function
provides controls values coming from the application to each algorithm.
Each algorithm is responsible for retrieving the controls associated to them.
Signed-off-by: Florian Sylvestre <fsylvestre@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Add the init() function that will be called during algorithm initialization
to provide each algorithm the list of algorithms tuning data.
Signed-off-by: Florian Sylvestre <fsylvestre@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
In order to allow dynamic instantiation of algorithms based on tuning
data files, add a mechanism to register algorithms with the IPA module.
The implementation relies on an AlgorithmFactory class and a
registration macro, similar to the pipeline handler registration
mechanism. The main difference is that the algorithm registration and
instantiation are implemented in the Module class instead of the
AlgorithmFactory class, making the factory an internal implementation
detail.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
libipa defines an abstract Algorithm class template that is specialized
by IPA modules. IPA modules then instantiate and manage algorithms
internally, without help from libipa. With ongoing work on tuning data
support for the RkISP1, and future similar work for the IPU3, more code
duplication for algorithms management is expected.
To address this and share code between multiple IPA modules, introduce a
new Module class template that will define and manage top-level concepts
for the IPA module.
The Module class template needs to be specialized with the same types as
the Algorithm class. To avoid manual specialization of both classes,
store the types in the Module class, and replace the template arguments
of the Algorithm class with a single Module argument from which the
other types are retrieved.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Currently we have a single structure of IPAFrameContext but
subsequently, we shall have a ring buffer (or similar) container
to keep IPAFrameContext structures for each frame.
It would be a hassle to query out the frame context required for
process() (since they will reside in a ring buffer) by the IPA
for each process. Hence, prepare the process() libipa template to
accept a particular IPAFrameContext early on.
As for this patch, we shall pass in the pointer as nullptr, so
that the changes compile and keep working as-is.
Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
The algorithms are using the same function names with specialized
parameters. Instead of duplicating code, introduce a libipa Algorithm
class which implements a base class with template parameters in libipa,
and use it in each IPA.
As we now won't need an algorithm class for each IPA, move the
documentation to libipa, and make it agnostic of the IPA used. While at
it, fix the IPU3::Algorithm::Awb documentation.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
The abstract Algorithm class was originally placed in libipa as an
attempt define a generic algorithm container. This was a little
optimistic and pushed a bit far too early.
Move the Algorithm class into the IPU3 which is the only user of the
class, as we adapt it to support modular algorithm components for the
IPU3.
Not documenting the namespace may cause issues with Doxygen in libipa.
The file libipa.cpp is thus created as an empty file for now, but we
can leverage it in the future to add more global libipa documentation,
and possibly code too.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
In order to instantiate and use algorithms (AWB, AGC, etc.)
there is a need for a common class to define mandatory methods.
Instead of reinventing the wheel, reuse what Raspberry Pi has done and
adapt to the minimum requirements expected.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Tested-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
