| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This is useful in many cases although not included in the stl.
Note: This is an ABI incompatible change.
Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Now that the ControlList::get() function returns an std::optional<>, it
is the preferred way to test if a control is present in a ControlList.
Use it in the test to prepare for removal of ControlList::contains().
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Test the ControlList::merge() method by creating a new list and
merging it with the existing one.
Test that the merged list contains all the controls, the existing values
do not get overwritten and the ones copied are not changed.
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
Reviewed-by: Hirokazu Honda <hiroh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
|
|
The current test verifies that after adding a new control to a list
already populated with one control the new one is present.
However the test wrongly tests for its presence twice instead of
making sure the existing control is still there.
Fix this by checking for the presence of both controls after the
update, and fix the error message accordingly.
Fixes: a8c40942b99e ("libcamera: controls: Improve the API towards applications")
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
Reviewed-by: Hirokazu Honda <hiroh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
|
|
Use the CameraSensor ID as the camera name in pipelines that uses a
CameraSensors, this is done in preparation of turning the camera name
into an ID. The CameraSensor ID meets the requirements that will be put
on camera ID.
Before this change example of camera names:
* OF based systems
ov5695 7-0036
ov2685 7-003c
* ACPI based systems
ov13858 8-0010
ov5670 10-0036
* VIMC
VIMC Sensor B
After this change the same cameras are:
* OF based systems
/base/i2c@ff160000/camera@36
/base/i2c@ff160000/camera@36
* ACPI based systems
\_SB_.PCI0.I2C2.CAM0
\_SB_.PCI0.I2C4.CAM1
* VIMC
platform/vimc.0 Sensor B
Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
|
|
The libcamera internal headers are located in src/libcamera/include/.
The directory is added to the compiler headers search path with a meson
include_directories() directive, and internal headers are included with
(e.g. for the internal semaphore.h header)
#include "semaphore.h"
All was well, until libcxx decided to implement the C++20
synchronization library. The __threading_support header gained a
#include <semaphore.h>
to include the pthread's semaphore support. As include_directories()
adds src/libcamera/include/ to the compiler search path with -I, the
internal semaphore.h is included instead of the pthread version.
Needless to say, the compiler isn't happy.
Three options have been considered to fix this issue:
- Use -iquote instead of -I. The -iquote option instructs gcc to only
consider the header search path for headers included with the ""
version. Meson unfortunately doesn't support this option.
- Rename the internal semaphore.h header. This was deemed to be the
beginning of a long whack-a-mole game, where namespace clashes with
system libraries would appear over time (possibly dependent on
particular system configurations) and would need to be constantly
fixed.
- Move the internal headers to another directory to create a unique
namespace through path components. This causes lots of churn in all
the existing source files through the all project.
The first option would be best, but isn't available to us due to missing
support in meson. Even if -iquote support was added, we would need to
fix the problem before a new version of meson containing the required
support would be released.
The third option is thus the only practical solution available. Bite the
bullet, and do it, moving headers to include/libcamera/internal/.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
|
|
Two tests use the brightness, contrast and saturation controls with
integer failures. They were not updated by commit eff4b1aa01c1 which
turned those controls into floats. This doesn't cause test failures as
the control API converts the value types. For correctness, update the
tests to use float values.
Fixes: eff4b1aa01c1 ("libcamera: controls: Reorder and update description of existing controls")
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
|
|
Since commit fac471e812a9 ("test: Extract CameraTest class out of camera
tests to libtest") the control_list is a subclass of CameraTest, and the
status returned by the base class init() operation should be inspected
to avoid accessing uninitialized fields during the run() operation
execution.
If the VIMC test module is not loaded, executing the test results in a
segfault. Fix this by adding the init() operation where to status_ flag
is checked for errors.
Fixes: fac471e812a9 ("test: Extract CameraTest class out of camera tests to libtest")
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
|
|
Many tests other than the camera/ tests use a camera. To increase code
sharing, move the base CameraTest class to the test library. The class
becomes a helper that doesn't inherit from Test anymore (to avoid
diamond inheritance issues when more such helpers will exist).
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
The ControlList class has template get() and set() methods to get and
set control values. The methods require a reference to a Control
instance, which is only available when calling them with a hardcoded
control. In order to support usage of ControlList for V4L2 controls, as
well as serialisation and deserialisation of ControlList, we need a way
to get and set control values based on a control numerical ID. Add new
contains(), get() and set() overload methods to do so.
As this change prepares the ControlList to be used for other objects
than camera, update its documentation accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Tested-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
Replace the manual validation of controls against a Camera with usage of
the new ControlValidator interface.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
The ControlList::update() method is unused. While it is meant to fulfil
a need of applications, having no user means that it is most probably
not correctly designed. Remove the method, we will add it back later if
needed.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
Rework the control-related classes to improve the API towards
applications. The goal is to enable writing code similar to
Request *req = ...;
ControlList &controls = req->controls();
controls->set(controls::AwbEnable, false);
controls->set(controls::ManualExposure, 1000);
...
int32_t exposure = controls->get(controls::ManualExposure);
with the get and set operations ensuring type safety for the control
values. This is achieved by creating the following classes:
- Control defines controls and is the main way to reference a control.
It is a template class to allow methods using it to refer to the
control type.
- ControlId is the base class of Control. It stores the control ID, name
and type, and can be used in contexts where a control needs to be
referenced regardless of its type (for instance in lists of controls).
This class replaces ControlIdentifier.
- ControlValue is kept as-is.
The ControlList class now exposes two template get() and set() methods
that replace the operator[]. They ensure type safety by infering the
value type from the Control reference that they receive.
The main way to refer to a control is now through the Control class, and
optionally through its base ControlId class. The ControlId enumeration
is removed, replaced by a list of global Control instances. Numerical
control IDs are turned into macros, and are still exposed as they are
required to communicate with IPAs (especially to deserialise control
lists). They should however not be used by applications.
Auto-generation of header and source files is removed for now to keep
the change simple. It will be added back in the future in a more
elaborate form.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
Make the control API more explicit when dealing with integer controls by
specifying the size. We already do so for 64-bit integers, using int64_t
and ControlTypeInteger64, do the same for 32-bit integers.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
The ControlValue get accessors are implemented with functions of
different names, whlie the set accessors use polymorphism to support
different control types. This isn't very consistent and intuitive. Make
the API clearer by using template methods. This will also have the added
advantage that support for the new types will only require adding
template specialisations, without adding new methods.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
The CameraManager class is not supposed to be instantiated multiple
times, which led to a singleton implementation. This requires a global
instance of the CameraManager, which is destroyed when the global
destructors are executed.
Relying on global instances causes issues with cleanup, as the order in
which the global destructors are run can't be controlled. In particular,
the Android camera HAL implementation ends up destroying the
CameraHalManager after the CameraManager, which leads to use-after-free
problems.
To solve this, remove the CameraManager::instance() method and make the
CameraManager class instantiable directly. Multiple instances are still
not allowed, and this is enforced by storing the instance pointer
internally to be checked when an instance is created.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
|
|
Add tests of the ControlList infrastructure and public API.
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
