| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The algorithms are using the same function names with specialized
parameters. Instead of duplicating code, introduce a libipa Algorithm
class which implements a base class with template parameters in libipa,
and use it in each IPA.
As we now won't need an algorithm class for each IPA, move the
documentation to libipa, and make it agnostic of the IPA used. While at
it, fix the IPU3::Algorithm::Awb documentation.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
The abstract Algorithm class was originally placed in libipa as an
attempt define a generic algorithm container. This was a little
optimistic and pushed a bit far too early.
Move the Algorithm class into the IPU3 which is the only user of the
class, as we adapt it to support modular algorithm components for the
IPU3.
Not documenting the namespace may cause issues with Doxygen in libipa.
The file libipa.cpp is thus created as an empty file for now, but we
can leverage it in the future to add more global libipa documentation,
and possibly code too.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
In order to instantiate and use algorithms (AWB, AGC, etc.)
there is a need for a common class to define mandatory methods.
Instead of reinventing the wheel, reuse what Raspberry Pi has done and
adapt to the minimum requirements expected.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Tested-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
