| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Multiple local functions are defined in the global namespace without the
static keyword. This compiles fine for now, but will cause a missing
declaration warning when we enable them. To prepare for that, move the
function declaration to an anonymous namespace.
While at it, for consistency, include an existing static function in the
namespace and drop the static keyword.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Source files in libcamera start by a comment block header, which
includes the file name and a one-line description of the file contents.
While the latter is useful to get a quick overview of the file contents
at a glance, the former is mostly a source of inconvenience. The name in
the comments can easily get out of sync with the file name when files
are renamed, and copy & paste during development have often lead to
incorrect names being used to start with.
Readers of the source code are expected to know which file they're
looking it. Drop the file name from the header comment block.
The change was generated with the following script:
----------------------------------------
dirs="include/libcamera src test utils"
declare -rA patterns=(
['c']=' \* '
['cpp']=' \* '
['h']=' \* '
['py']='# '
['sh']='# '
)
for ext in ${!patterns[@]} ; do
files=$(for dir in $dirs ; do find $dir -name "*.${ext}" ; done)
pattern=${patterns[${ext}]}
for file in $files ; do
name=$(basename ${file})
sed -i "s/^\(${pattern}\)${name} - /\1/" "$file"
done
done
----------------------------------------
This misses several files that are out of sync with the comment block
header. Those will be addressed separately and manually.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
When file output is requested from cam app, it simply dumps the
processed data and it must be converted to a readable image format
manually. Let's add support for PPM output file format to make files
produced by cam directly readable by image display and processing
software.
For now, only BGR888 output format, which is the simplest one to use, is
supported but nothing prevents adding support for other output formats
if needed. Nevertheless, they would typically need byte reordering or
other conversions for PPM file format. It may be better to find a way to
dump the image data in other output formats directly using some of the
already existing file formats or raw file format converters.
Signed-off-by: Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Add a '--orientation|-o' option to the cam test application to set
an orientation to the image stream.
Supported values are the ones obtained by applying flips to the camera
sensor:
- rot0: no rotation
- rot180: rotate 180 degrees
- flip: vertical flip
- mirror: horizontal flip
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: David Plowman <david.plowman@raspberrypi.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Multiple source files in the src/apps/cam/ directory are used by cam,
qcam and lc-compliance. They are compiled separately for each
application. Move them to a new src/apps/common/ directory and compile
them in a static library to decrease the number of compilation
operations.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
The cam and qcam test application share code, currently through a crude
hack that references the cam source files directly from the qcam
meson.build file. To prepare for the introduction of hosting that code
in a static library, move all applications to src/apps/.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
