| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Refactor lc-compliance using Googletest as the test framework.
Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
|
|
Add a singleton Environment class in order to make the camera available
inside all tests. This is needed for the Googletest refactor, otherwise
the tests, which are statically declared, won't be able to access the
camera.
Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
|
|
Now that we have a libcamera_private, make the public only dependency
libcamera_public so that it is clear which interface is being linked.
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Add a compliance tool to ease testing of cameras. In contrast to the
unit-tests under test/ that aims to test the internal components of
libcamera the compliance tool aims to test application use-cases and to
some extent the public API.
This change adds the boilerplate code of a simple framework for the
creation of tests. The tests aim both to demonstrate the tool and to
catch real problems. The tests added are:
- Test that if one queues exactly N requests to a camera exactly N
requests are eventually completed.
- Test that a configured camera can be started and stopped multiple
times in an attempt to exercise cleanup code paths otherwise not
often tested with 'cam' for example.
Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
Acked-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Tested-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Tested-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@ideasonboard.com>
|
