| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The black level obtained from the tuning file in software ISP is
retrieved in init (because this is the standard algorithm method with
access to tuning data) and stored into context. But the context gets
reset in configure and the black level is lost and never applied.
Let's store the black level from the tuning file into an algorithm
instance variable and put it into the context only later in configure.
This is similar to what rkisp1 IPA does with the values obtained from
the tuning file.
Fixes: 41e3d61c745153779ed5a38634d7266bffd60d61 ("libcamera: software_isp: Clear IPA context on configure and stop")
Signed-off-by: Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Robert Mader <robert.mader@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
This patch allows obtaining a black level from a tuning file in addition
to the camera sensor helper. If both of them define a black level, the
one from the tuning file takes precedence.
The use cases are:
- A user wants to use a different black level, for whatever reason.
- There is a sensor without known gains but with a known black level.
Because a camera sensor helper cannot be defined without specifying
gains, the only way to specify the black level is using the tuning
file. Software ISP uses its fallback gain handling in such a case.
Signed-off-by: Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
The black level in software ISP is unconditionally guessed from the
obtained frames. CameraSensorHelper optionally provides the black level
from camera specifications now. Let's use the value if available.
If the black level is not available from the given CameraSensorHelper
instance, it's still determined on the fly.
Signed-off-by: Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Tested-by: Robert Mader <robert.mader@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
The black level is likely to get updated, if ever, only after exposure
or gain changes. Don't compute its possible updates if exposure and
gain are unchanged.
It's probably not worth trying to implement something more
sophisticated. Better to spend the effort on supporting tuning files.
Signed-off-by: Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
The black level determination, already present as a separate class, can
be moved to the prepared Algorithm processing structure. It is the
first of the current software ISP algorithms that is called in the stats
processing sequence, which means it is also the first one that should be
moved to the new structure. Stats processing starts with calling
Algorithm-based processing so the call order of the algorithms is
retained.
Movement of this algorithm is relatively straightforward because all it
does is processing stats.
The comment about getting black level from the tuning files is dropped.
The black level will be taken from CameraSensorHelper if available and
that will be implemented in one of the followup patches.
Black level is now recomputed on each stats processing. In a future
patch, after DelayedControls are used, this will be changed to recompute
the black level only after exposure/gain changes.
The black level depends on the sensor used, the computed value can be
reused in a followup capture sessions with the same sensor. Thus it is
sufficient to (re)set the initial value in BlackLevel::init.
Signed-off-by: Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
