Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The clang formatter removes spaces in places of empty expressions in for
loops. For example, it changes
for (init; condition; )
to
for (init; condition;)
libcamera currently uses both the styles and we should use only one of
them for consistency. Since there is apparently no option to override
the formatter behavior (see
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.html), let's remove
the extra spaces to make the formatter happy.
Signed-off-by: Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Unlike in C where they have been standardized since C99, variable-length
arrays in C++ are an extension supported by gcc and clang. Clang started
warning about this with -Wall in version 18:
src/libcamera/ipc_unixsocket.cpp:250:11: error: variable length arrays in C++ are a Clang extension [-Werror,-Wvla-cxx-extension]
250 | char buf[CMSG_SPACE(num * sizeof(uint32_t))];
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
One simple option is to disable the warning. However, usage of VLAs in
C++ is discouraged by some, usually due to security reasons, based on
the rationale that developers are often unaware of unintentional use of
VLAs and how they may affect the security of the code when the array
size is not properly validated.
This rationale may sound dubious, as the most commonly proposed fix is
to replace VLAs with vectors (or just arrays dynamically allocated with
new() wrapped in unique pointers), without adding any size validation.
This will not produce much better results. However, keeping the VLA
warning and converting the code to dynamic allocation may still be
slightly better, as it can prompt developers to notice VLAs and check if
size validation is required.
For these reasons, convert all VLAs to std::vector. Most of the VLAs
don't need extra size validation, as the size is bound through different
constraints (e.g. image width for line buffers). An arguable exception
may be the buffers in IPCUnixSocket::sendData() and
IPCUnixSocket::recvData() as the number of fds is not bound-checked
locally, but we will run out of file descriptors before we could
overflow the buffer size calculation.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Source files in libcamera start by a comment block header, which
includes the file name and a one-line description of the file contents.
While the latter is useful to get a quick overview of the file contents
at a glance, the former is mostly a source of inconvenience. The name in
the comments can easily get out of sync with the file name when files
are renamed, and copy & paste during development have often lead to
incorrect names being used to start with.
Readers of the source code are expected to know which file they're
looking it. Drop the file name from the header comment block.
The change was generated with the following script:
----------------------------------------
dirs="include/libcamera src test utils"
declare -rA patterns=(
['c']=' \* '
['cpp']=' \* '
['h']=' \* '
['py']='# '
['sh']='# '
)
for ext in ${!patterns[@]} ; do
files=$(for dir in $dirs ; do find $dir -name "*.${ext}" ; done)
pattern=${patterns[${ext}]}
for file in $files ; do
name=$(basename ${file})
sed -i "s/^\(${pattern}\)${name} - /\1/" "$file"
done
done
----------------------------------------
This misses several files that are out of sync with the comment block
header. Those will be addressed separately and manually.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Multiple source files in the src/apps/cam/ directory are used by cam,
qcam and lc-compliance. They are compiled separately for each
application. Move them to a new src/apps/common/ directory and compile
them in a static library to decrease the number of compilation
operations.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|