| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Move the class support infrastructure to the base library.
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Hirokazu Honda <hiroh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Replace existing use cases where the copy constructor and copy
assignment operator are deleted with the LIBCAMERA_DISABLE_COPY
statement
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
FrameBufferAllocator is supposed to delete copy constructor and
copy-assignment operator. It doesn't do that as it uses Camera as a
parameter instead of FrameBufferAllocator.
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
The Camera class currently requires the allocator to have no allocated
buffer before the camera is reconfigured, and the allocator to be
destroyed before the camera is released. There's no basis for these
restrictions anymore, remove them.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
|
|
buffers
The FrameBuffer interface is based on the idea that all buffers are
allocated externally to libcamera and are only used by it. This is meant
to create a simpler API centered around usage of buffers, regardless of
where they come from.
Linux however lacks a centralized allocator at the moment, and not all
users of libcamera are expected to use another device that could provide
suitable buffers for the camera. This patch thus adds a helper class to
allocate buffers internally in libcamera, in a way that matches the
needs of the FrameBuffer-based API.
Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
|
