| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Source files in libcamera start by a comment block header, which
includes the file name and a one-line description of the file contents.
While the latter is useful to get a quick overview of the file contents
at a glance, the former is mostly a source of inconvenience. The name in
the comments can easily get out of sync with the file name when files
are renamed, and copy & paste during development have often lead to
incorrect names being used to start with.
Readers of the source code are expected to know which file they're
looking it. Drop the file name from the header comment block.
The change was generated with the following script:
----------------------------------------
dirs="include/libcamera src test utils"
declare -rA patterns=(
['c']=' \* '
['cpp']=' \* '
['h']=' \* '
['py']='# '
['sh']='# '
)
for ext in ${!patterns[@]} ; do
files=$(for dir in $dirs ; do find $dir -name "*.${ext}" ; done)
pattern=${patterns[${ext}]}
for file in $files ; do
name=$(basename ${file})
sed -i "s/^\(${pattern}\)${name} - /\1/" "$file"
done
done
----------------------------------------
This misses several files that are out of sync with the comment block
header. Those will be addressed separately and manually.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Remove the verbose #ifndef/#define/#endif pattern for maintaining
header idempotency, and replace it with a simple #pragma once.
This simplifies the headers, and prevents redundant changes when
header files get moved.
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
libunwind has an API to provide symbolic names for functions. It's less
optimal than using backtrace_symbols() or libdw, as it doesn't allow
deferring the symbolic names lookup, but it can be usefull as a fallback
if no other option is available.
A sample backtrace when falling back to libunwind looks like
libcamera::VimcCameraData::init()+0xbd
libcamera::PipelineHandlerVimc::match(libcamera::DeviceEnumerator*)+0x3e0
libcamera::CameraManager::Private::createPipelineHandlers()+0x1a7
libcamera::CameraManager::Private::init()+0x98
libcamera::CameraManager::Private::run()+0x9f
libcamera::Thread::startThread()+0xee
decltype(*(std::__1::forward<libcamera::Thread*>(fp0)).*fp()) std::__1::__invoke<void (libcamera::Thread::*)(), libcamera::Thread*, void>(void (libcamera::Thread::*&&)(), libcamera::Thread*&&)+0x77
void std::__1::__thread_execute<std::__1::unique_ptr<std::__1::__thread_struct, std::__1::default_delete<std::__1::__thread_struct> >, void (libcamera::Thread::*)(), libcamera::Thread*, 2ul>(std::__1::tuple<std::__1::unique_ptr<std::__1::__thread_struct, std::__1::default_delete<std::__1::__thread_struct> >, void (libcamera::Thread::*)(), libcamera::Thread*>&, std::__1::__tuple_indices<2ul>)+0x3e
void* std::__1::__thread_proxy<std::__1::tuple<std::__1::unique_ptr<std::__1::__thread_struct, std::__1::default_delete<std::__1::__thread_struct> >, void (libcamera::Thread::*)(), libcamera::Thread*> >(void*)+0x62
start_thread+0xde
???
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
libunwind is an alternative to glibc's backtrace() to extract a
backtrace. Use it when available to extend backtrace support to more
platforms.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
|
Create a new class to abstract generation and access to call stack
backtraces. The current implementation depends on the glibc backtrace()
implementation and is copied from the logger. Future development will
bring support for libunwind, transparently for the users of the class.
The logger backtrace implementation is dropped, replaced by usage of the
new Backtrace class.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
|
